I have two objects, A and B. Right now, B stores A as a local class variable.
class B
{
A myA;
}
Now, B has a bunch of methods which uses its inner myA
to do some stuff, and I can use those methods since they are public.
But sometimes, I need to use the myA
itself. So what I did was to make it public, and then I could write myB.myA.someMethodFromA()
.
Is this okay, or is it bad style? I mean, I know that I could just provide indirect accessors to myA
via methods in the B class, but that seems unnecessary when I can just directly access myA
.
For example, if myA
has a method doStuffviaA
, I'd rather say myB.myA.doStuffViaA()
, than first having to write a method in B that says
void doStuffViaB() { myA.doStuffViaB() }
But, of course making myA
public means that it can be changed without B
knowing about it. WHAT TO DO?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire