Imagine I have this classes:
public class MyClass : IMyClass
{
private readonly ISomething1 _something1;
private readonly ISomething2 _something2;
public MyClass(ISomething1 something1, ISomething2 something2)
{
_something1 = something1;
_something2 = something2;
}
public SomeObject Get(AnotherObject anotherObject)
{
var a = _something1.Calculate(anotherObject.Property1);
var b = _something2.Get(anotherObject.Property2, a);
return b;
}
}
public class MyClass2 : IMyClass
{
private readonly ISomething1 _something1;
private readonly ISomething2 _something2;
public MyClass(ISomething1 something1, ISomething2 something2)
{
_something1 = something1;
_something2 = something2;
}
public SomeObject Get(AnotherObject anotherObject)
{
var a = _something1.Calculate(anotherObject.Property1);
var b = _something2.Get(anotherObject.Property2, a);
return b;
}
}
It looks like MyClass and Myclass2 are very similar. However, the difference is that I am injecting different implementations of ISomething1 and ISomething2 for these classes using Ninject:
//MyClass
Bind<ISomething1>().To<AmazingSomething>().WhenInjectedInto<MyClass>();
Bind<ISomething2>().To<BeautifulSomething>().WhenInjectedInto<MyClass>();
//MyClass2
Bind<ISomething1>().To<GoodSomething>().WhenInjectedInto<MyClass2>();
Bind<ISomething2>().To<UglySomething>().WhenInjectedInto<MyClass2>();
I don't like this solution because it violates DRY principle. However, I like it because it is following Open/closed principle (I hope so).
Is there a better way to accomplish my goal?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire