I've been doing a lot of reading on dependency injection over the last few days and have been using Aura.DI to have a play with IoC principles. I've come up against a few issues I've heard are common when implementing this pattern, but I'm still not quite sure on some of the details.
If I want to inject a logger (say Monolog) into a controller class (just an easy example), I would like to use the class name as the logging channel (basically new Logger('somecontroller')
), as far as I can tell, this would mean manually defining that 'injection' for each and every class, am I right in thinking this?
This:
$controller = new PageController(new Logger('PageController'));
in Aura.DI, would be:
$di->params['PageController'] = [
'logger' => $di->lazyNew('Logger', ['name' => 'PageController'])
];
but I'd have to do that for every controller that I want a different logging channel for?! I've heard that you can use the Abstract Factory Pattern here, but I'm not sure how this would work? (I understand the Factory pattern, but have never been in a situation where I thought it would help me. The Abstract Factory pattern is new to me though)
I know I could write a simple method to iterate over an array of controllers and do this in a less verbose way, but it does feel kind of wrong to have to do that.
I also came across this post on reddit and thought it made a bit of sense. If I'm going to have to manually configure all of these dependencies anyway, why not just make my configuration the actual implementation? Maybe this falls apart when the dependency tree gets a bit larger? I though it was worth asking what peoples' opinions were though.
Any light that you can shed on any/all of my questions would be appreciated.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire