I've found myself in a situation where I have 2 isolate scope directives (each managing differentiated scope and dom state) that are referring to a single template.
.directive1...
scope: {},
templateUrl: 'template1',
.directive2...
scope: {},
templateUrl: 'template1',
I'm used to having a 1-to-1 relationship between my directives and their templates, and this model (2 directives - to - 1 template) has me veering from that pattern.
Is there a good reason I shouldn't have multiple isolate scope directives referring to the same template?
Is this in violation of some 'best practices' design pattern thought?
Are there other design considerations I should be taking into account here?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire